COLLECTING
ON A PAST-DUE DEBT:
THE LOUISIANA OIL AND GAS PROCESSING FEE
By Foster Campbell, Louisiana
Public Service Commissioner
March 2007
Background
The State of Louisiana relies
heavily on oil and gas severance taxes and mineral
royalties as revenue for the State Treasury. The
state receives royalty payments for production
from State-owned lands and water bottoms, but
receives severance-tax revenue from all oil and
gas production on any property within state boundaries.
The state offshore boundary extends three miles
from the coastline, beyond which is federal territory.
The only revenue the state receives for production
in federal waters is 27 percent of the revenue
for the 3-mile-wide band of water that extends
from 3 miles to 6 miles from the state coastline,
which is the first 3 miles of federal waters.
Beyond that, the state receives no revenue from
the vast production in the federal offshore area.
Unfortunately, both oil and gas production from
within the borders of the state peaked in 1970.
Currently, Louisiana natural-gas production is
a meager 23 percent of its 1970 level, and Louisiana
oil production is 14 percent of its 1970 peak.
During this same period, imports of foreign oil
and gas and from federal offshore waters increased
dramatically.

As Louisiana’s oil and gas revenue base
has eroded, large quantities of oil and gas are
flooding into the state from production in federal
waters (called the federal “Outer Continental
Shelf,” or OCS) and foreign countries to
be refined or otherwise processed. These imports
provide the state no revenue to offset the loss
of revenue from long-declining state production.
It is worth noting that while Louisiana taxes
natural-gas production at a rate which is mid-range
relative to other states, Louisiana’s severance
tax on oil is the second highest after Alaska.
Also, Louisiana applies reduced-rate severance
taxes to marginal production at so-called “stripper
wells” and “incapable wells,”
as do most other states. The volume of all this
production continues to decline, while volumes
of untaxed federal OCS and foreign oil and gas
flood the state.

A Dwindling Revenue Base vs. a Growing Revenue
Base
Should Louisiana continue to
rely on a revenue structure that levies a high
tax on struggling in-state producers and ignores
the enormous volumes of oil and gas imported into
our state? Importing oil and gas from outside
Louisiana relies upon the people, infrastructure,
and resources of the state to process it so that
the rest of the country benefits from its availability
to fuel their automobiles and heat their homes
and businesses.
Louisiana production is only
4.5 percent of the oil processed in the state.
The remainder is 24.9 percent OCS, 12 percent
imported from other states, and 58.6 percent foreign
oil. For natural gas processed in the state, the
source is 24.3 percent Louisiana production, 46.3
percent OCS, 27 percent imported from other states,
and 2.4 percent foreign imports.
As noted, Louisiana production
is shrinking and state revenue along with it,
yet imports of oil and gas are on the rise. Were
the state tax base to include imported oil and
gas, it would be 22 times as big for oil and 4
times as big for natural gas as now. With a base
that large, a much lower fee than the current
Louisiana severance tax could generate much higher
revenue.
A lower processing fee on this larger volume could
provide a tax cut to current Louisiana oil and
gas producers, and also make possible the complete
elimination of the tax on marginal stripper and
incapable production.

Pre-’81 data from other-state
and foreign sources not available.

The Revenue Potential
The rate of the Louisiana oil
severance tax on full-rate production is 12.5
percent of value. The Louisiana natural-gas severance
tax is an indexed rate that changes each year
based on the previous year’s average market
price. The fiscal year 2007/08 natural-gas severance
tax rate is 26.9 cents per MCF (thousand cubic
feet), which is equivalent to 4.5 percent of value
for gas at a price of $6 per MCF.
For each 1 percent of value for
a processing fee on all oil and gas processed
in the state, approximately $918 million could
be generated in fiscal year 2008-09. A 6-percent
rate would produce $5.51 billion. All Louisiana
severance taxes would be repealed when the processing
fee goes into effect, and the net new revenue
produced by the processing fee would be $5.51
billion minus the $693 million in severance taxes
estimated to be generated, for a NET NEW REVENUE
of $4.82 billion. This is based on an oil price
of $57 per barrel and a natural gas price of $6
per MCF.
In summary: replacing a 12.5-percent-of-value
oil severance tax and a 6.2-percent-of-value natural-gas
severance tax — both paid only by Louisiana
producers — with a 6-percent-of-value processing
fee on all oil and gas produced or processed in
the state, would reduce taxes for Louisiana producers
while raising $4.8 billion annually in new revenue.
Attempts
to Avoid the Fee
Large national, international, and foreign oil
companies import oil into Louisiana from the Middle
East, Venezuela and the deep waters in the OCS.
Will they divert oil or gas around the state if
the processing fee is implemented? They will divert
as much as they economically can, but economics
and physical reality severely limit how much can
be diverted. Significant diversion was assumed.
The previous revenue projections are net after
diversion.

Diverting oil or gas around Louisiana
requires facilities (refineries matched to the
particular crude-oil types, gas-processing plants,
storage tank farms, etc.) that have the right
equipment and spare capacity, plus transportation
infrastructure (pipelines, barges, ships, railcars,
ports, rivers, canals, etc.) to move it where
it needs to go. All this assumes you can accomplish
this diversion economically.
There are substantial limits
to the availability, accessibility, and economic
viability of this processing and transportation
infrastructure. Little of it exists. For the above
revenue projections, it is assumed that all spare
processing capacity which is available for diversion
will be used, up to maximum sustainable operating
capacity, without regard to whether it is economic
or practical to do so.
Diversion Assumptions:
Oil:
It is assumed that all refined
products will be diverted. An estimated 434 million
barrels of crude oil currently coming into Louisiana
is assumed to be diverted. This is enough crude
oil to fill up to capacity (assuming a 96-percent
sustainable refinery utilization rate) every refinery
in the entire eastern half of the United States,
whether feasible to do so or not. Refineries beyond
that range are not feasible diversion alternatives.
Natural Gas:
It is assumed that 837 billion
cubic feet of natural gas currently coming into
the state will be diverted. This is equivalent
to about 16 percent of the gas entering Louisiana.
The United States is short of
processing capacity, especially refinery capacity,
and the construction of new processing capacity
in other states is severely limited and would
be a decades-long process. Local citizens routinely
and vehemently oppose building new pipelines,
refineries, and other hydrocarbon-processing facilities.
Environmental constraints due to emissions limits
on ozone and reactive hydrocarbons limit expansion
or siting of new facilities in the few communities
that would allow such development outside of Louisiana.
How
a Processing Fee Would Work
A processing fee is simply a fee on the processing
of oil or natural gas. The fee would apply to
refined petroleum products (typically fuels) that
are imported into the state and are further processed,
but not to petrochemicals. As contemplated in
Louisiana, the processing fee would replace the
severance f and would be applied only once, at
the first point of processing in the state. Further
processing steps would not be subject to the fee.
For Louisiana production, the first point of processing
would be at the wellhead, similar to the way severance
tax is applied, except at a lower rate.
Typically, hydrocarbons undergo
many processing steps at field-processing facilities
and other treatment equipment well before they
reach a major processing facility such as a natural-gas
plant or a petroleum refinery. The main exception
would be situations in which foreign crude oil
arrives at a refinery in a tanker that off-loads
directly at the refinery.
For the application of this fee,
hydrocarbon processing is defined as any process
or procedure whereby a hydrocarbon or mixture
of hydrocarbons, excluding petrochemicals, undergoes
any one or more of the following operations:
Absorption
Adsorption
Catalytic reaction
Chemical reaction or treatment
Compression
Cooling
Dehydration
Desulfurization
Depressurization
Emission Testing
Evaporation
Expansion
Extraction
Filtration
Fractionation |
Heating
or Heat Exchange
Isomerization
Liquefaction
Nitrogen rejection
Phase separation
Pressure, velocity, or flow measurement
Pressurization
Pumping
Purification
Refrigeration
Regasification
Sweetening
Thermal reaction or treatment
Throttling |
The processing fee would be applied
at the time the first processing step from the
list above takes place in the state. The processing
fee would be applied to hydrocarbons originating
outside the state at the first point of processing
within the state, and for hydrocarbons produced
within the state, at their first point of processing
within the state.
The
Constitutional Question
Constitutional scholars have
reviewed the processing fee and are confident
it would withstand likely federal court challenges.
The processing fee will apply equally to all oil
and gas processed in Louisiana, regardless of
where the oil or gas was originally produced.
The activity of processing the hydrocarbons in
the state establishes a significant nexus within
the state. The processing fee, unlike the unconstitutional
First Use Tax attempted years ago, should not
violate the Supremacy clause or the Commerce clause
of the U.S. Constitution.
Conclusion
Louisiana was a major oil and
gas production state when the severance tax was
written into the State Constitution in 1921. Today,
Louisiana is primarily an oil and gas processing
state. Despite this profound change in the basic
nature of the industry, the State’s method
of taxing oil and gas has remained virtually the
same for nearly 90 years. Enacting the oil and
gas processing fee — by constitutional amendment
approved by the voters of Louisiana — would match
the revenue base of state government to today’s
oil and gas industry. This change is long overdue
and much-needed.
Foster Campbell represents North Louisiana
on the Public Service Commission. Charts and graphs
reproduced in this paper are from the Louisiana
Department of Natural Resources. For more information,
call 318 676 7464 or email
foster@fostercampbell.com.
|